Refine your search
Collections
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sharma, Shailja
- CRISPR-A Powerful Functional Genomic Tool in Crop Improvement
Abstract Views :185 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Crop Improvement, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
1 Department of Crop Improvement, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 45, No 1&2 (2019), Pagination: 96-99Abstract
CRISPR and CRISPR Associated (Cas) Proteins (CRISPR-Cas) system is a vital defense system found in bacteria and archea. CRISPR activity requires a set of Cas genes, found adjacent to the CRISPR, that codes for protein essential for immune response. CRISPR system works in three stages to carry out a full immune response to invading foreign DNA i.e. acquisition, expression and interference stage. Recently Type II CRISPR-Cas9 system has also been adapted to perform genome engineering by inducing double-strand breaks (DSBs) in host DNA that can be repaired by either non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR). Although the full potential of CRISPR-Cas9 has not been harnessed so far, this technology has already brought revolutionary changes in genomic research. CRISPR-Cas9 system has great potential for both research and therapeutics; however, improvements can still be made in its speci?city, efficiency and off target effects. With the advancement, the use of this system is increased in model plants as well as other crop plants like Arabidopsis, tobacco, maize, rice, wheat, sorghum, barley, brassica, soybean etc.Keywords
CRISPR, Cas, Spacer, Repeat, Crop Improvement.References
- Curtin SJ, Voytas DF and Stupar RM. 2012. Genome engineering of crops with designer nucleases. The Plant Genome 5 (2): 42-50.
- Guilinger JP, Thompson DB and Liu DR. 2014. Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the speci? city of genome modi? cation. Nature Biotechnology 32: 577-582.
- Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K, Amemura M and Nakata A. 1987. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in E coli and identification of the gene product. Journal of Bacteriology 169: 5429-5433.
- Jansen R, Embden JDAV, Gaastra W and Schouls LM. 1995. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Molecular Microbiology 43:1565-1575.
- Kim D, Alptekin B and Budak K. 2018. CRISPR/ Cas 9 genome editing in wheat. Functional and integrative Genomics 18: 31-41.
- Khandagale K and Nadaf A. 2016. Genome editing for targeted improvement of plants. Plant Biotechnology Report 4: 51-68.
- Li J, Zhang H, Si,X, Tian Y, Chen K and Liu J. 2017. Generation of thermosensistive male sterile maize by targeted knockout of ZMTMS gene. Journal of 5 Genetics and Genomics 44: 465-468.
- Mojica FJM, Ferrer C, Juez G and Rodrýguez-Valera F. 2002. Long stretches of short tandem repeats are present in the largest replicons of the Archaea Haloferax mediterranei and Haloferax volcanii and could be involved in replicon partitioning. Molecular Microbiology 17: 85–93.
- Rani R, Yadav P, Barbadinkar KM, Baliyan N, Malhotra EV, Singh VK, Kumar A and Singh D. 2016. CRISPR/Cas-9: A promising way to exploit genetic variations in the plants. Biotechnological Letters 38: 1991-2006.
- Shen C, Que Z, Xia Y, Tang N, Li D & He R. 2017. Rapid generation of genetic diversity by multiplex CRISPR/ Cas 9 genome editing in rice. China life Sciences 60: 506-515.
- Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M, Greene EC and Doudna JA. 2014. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507: 62–67.
- Voytas DF. 2013. Plant genome engineering with sequence specific nucleases. Annual Review Plant Biology 64: 327-350.
- Wiles MV, Qin W, Cheng AW and Wang H. 2015. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing and guide RNA design. Mammalian Genome 26: 501510.
- Xu T, Li Y, Nostrand JDV, He Z and Zhou J. 2014. Cas9 based tool for targeted genome editing and transcriptional control. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 80: 1544-1552.
- Effects of Different Growth Media on Germinability of Interspecific Hybrids between Vigna mungo< and V. umbellata
Abstract Views :217 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 46, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 29-35Abstract
A total of 15 interspecific crosses involving five genotypes of urdbean (Vigna mungo) and three genotypes of ricebean (V. umbellata) were attempted to study the effects of different growth media on hybrid germination. Since the seeds obtained from the interspecific crosses did not germinate under normal soil conditions so attempts were made to grow them on various media i.e. Salt solution, Half and full strength MS medium, MS basal medium and Gamborg B5 media. Seeds were able to germinate only on the salt solution. F1 seeds obtained from cross Him Mash-1 x VRB-3 showed maximum response on salt solution with respect to radicle formation (44.60 per cent) followed by Palampur-93 x PRR-2 (38.30 per cent) & Him Mash-1 x PRR-1 (23.89 per cent).Cross Palampur-93 x PRR-2 (17.02 per cent) produced maximum number of plantlets followed by Him Mash-1 x VRB-3 (15.32 per cent). The study indicated that different kinds of post fertilization barriers such as retarded embryo & endosperm development, production of inviable & shriveled seed, inability of seed to form radicle and yellowing of plantlets are responsible for complete lethality. The crosses showing substantially high per cent of germination can be utilized for genetic improvement of urdbean.Keywords
Interspecific Hybridization, Germinability, V. mungo, V. umbellata.References
- Ali M, Gupta S, Singh BB and Kumar S. 2006. Role of plant introduction in varietal development of pulses in India. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 19: 346-352.
- Anonymous. 2018. Data on pulses IIPR Kanpur. http://iipr.res.in/e-pulse-data-book.html
- Basavaraja T, Murthy N, Kumar VL and Mallikarjun K. 2018. Studies on cross compatibility in interspecific crosses of Vigna radiata x Vigna umbellata species. Legume Research DOI:10.18805/LR-3974.
- Bharathi A, Selvaraj KSV, Veerabadhiran P and Laksh BS. 2006. Crossability barriers in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek): with its wild relatives. Indian Journal of Crop Science 1: 120-124.
- Bhareti P, Singh DP and Khulbe RK. 2011. Genetic variability and association analysis of advanced lines and cultivars following intervarietal and interspecific crosses in blackgram. Crop Improvement 38: 67-70.
- Bindra S, Mittal RK, Sood VK and Chaudhary HK. 2020.Alien Introgression studies involving Vigna mungo x Vigna umbellata hybridization. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 9 (02): 268-276.
- Biswas MR and S Dana. 1975. Blackgram x ricebean cross. Cytologia 40: 787-795.
- Chaisan T, Somta P, Srinives P, Chanprame S, Kaveeta R, Dumrongkittikule S. 2013. Development of tetraploid plants from an interspecific hybrid between mungbean (Vigna radiata) and ricebean (Vigna umbellata). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 16: 45-51.
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. Problem data. In: Statistical procedures for Agricultural Research. WileyInterscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Singapore. p 272-315.
- Gopinathan MC, Babu CR and Shivanna KR. 1986. Interspecific hybridization between ricebean (Vigna umbellata) and its wild relative (V. minima), fertility sterility relationships. Euphytica 35: 1017-1022.
- Gosal SS and Bajaj YPS. 1983. Interspecific hybridization between Vigna mungo and Vigna radiata through embryo culture. Euphytica 32: 129-137.
- Lekhi P, Gill RK, Kaur S and Bains TS. 2017. Generation of interspecific hybrids for introgression of mungbean yellow mosaic virus resistance in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Legume Research 41 (4):526-531.
- Malik BA. 1994. Grain legumes. In: Crop Production (Ed.): MS Nazir. National Book Foundation, Islamabad. p 301.
- Mittal RK, Katna G and Sood BC. 2005. Interspecific hybridization in the genus Vigna. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Food Legumes Research, Oct.2005, New Delhi.
- Mittal RK, Sood BC, Sharma R and Katna G. 2008. Interspecific hybridization and DNA based polymorphism in urdbean (V. mungo), ricbean (V. umbellata) and adzukibean (V. angularis). Abst. The Third Asian Chromosome Colloquium, Chromosome Science 11: 48.
- Pandiyan M , Senthil N, Suresh R, Chakravarthy N, Packiraj D and Jagadeesh S. 2012. Interspecific hybridization of Vigna radiata x V. trilobata. Wudpecker Journal of Agricultural Research 1: 233-234.
- Pandiyan M, Senthil N, Ramamoorthi N, Muthiah AR, Tomooka N, Duncan V and Jayaraj T. 2010. Interspecific hybridization of Vigna radiata x 13 wild Vigna species for developing MYMV donar. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1: 600-610.
- Rashid KA, Smartt J and Haq N. 1987. Hybridization in the genus Vigna. In: Mungbean, Proceeding of the Second International Symposium, AVRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan p 205-214.
- Sanders MR, Franzke CJ and Ross JG. 1959. Influence of environmental factors on origin of colchicine-induced true-breeding diploid mutants in sorghum. American Journal of Botany 46: 119-125.
- Sehrawat N, Yadav M, Bhat KV, Sairam RK and Jaiwal PK. 2016. Introgression of mungbean yellow mosaic virus resistance in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and purity testing of F hybrids using SSRs .Turkish Journal of Agriculture 1 and Forestry 40: 95-100.
- Singh BM, Sood AK and Saharan GS. 1978. Occurrence of leaf spot and blight of blackgram caused by Colletotrichum dematium. Indian Phytopathology 31: 100-101.
- Zeven AC and De Wet JMJ. 1982. Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity. Centre for Agricultural Publication and Documentation, Wageningen.
- Assessment of Variability Parameters for Seed Yield and Related Component Traits in Blackgram [Vigna mungo (L). Hepper] Generations
Abstract Views :89 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 47, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 24-32Abstract
The research was carried out to assess the nature and magnitude of genetic variability, along with proportions of heritability and genetic advance among 14 crosses and ten parents by considering 11 yield and its related traits in blackgram. The investigation was undertaken in the Experimental Farm of Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, CSKHPKV, Palampur (H.P.) during Kharif 2018 and 2019 in Randomized Complete Block Design over three replications. Analysis of Variance revealed significant differences among the genotypes for all the traits in both the generations. High PCV and GCV was recorded for biological yield per plant (g), seed yield per plant (g) and harvest index (%). High heritability along with high genetic advance was recorded for pods per plant, biological yield per plant, seed yield per plant and harvest index in both the generations indicating the preponderance of additive gene action to develop desirable and stable genotypes during breeding programme.Keywords
Blackgram, Variability, Heritability, Genetic Advance.References
- Aftab N, Lal GM, Sheera A, Bose NC and Tripathi AM. 2018. Evaluation of genetic variability in black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) germplasm. Journal of Plant Development Sciences 10: 445-452.
- Anonymous. 2018. Data on pulses state-wise IIPR Kanpur. http://iipr.res.in/e-pulse-data-book-state-wise.html
- Anonymous. 2019. Data on pulses IIPR Kanpur. http://iipr.res.in/e-pulse-data-book.html
- Blessy V, Naik BP and Yadav BNP. 2018. Studies on genetic variability in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7: 17301732.
- Burton GW and Devane EH. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agronomy Journal 45: 478-481.
- Chaithanya K, Rajesh S, Suresh BG, Kumar S and Lal GM. 2019.Assessment of genetic variability parameter in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] germplasm.International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8: 1853-1860.
- Chauhan S, Mittal RK, Sood VK and Patial R. 2018.Evaluation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Research 1004: 1-6.
- Chowdhury T, Das A, Mandal GS, Bhattacharya S and Chatterjee S. 2020. Genetic variability, character association and divergence study in urdbean [Vigna mungo (L). Hepper]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 9: 1726-1734.
- Gandi R, Shunmugavalii N and Muthuswamy. 2018. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance analysis in segregating population of blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 703-709.
- Gupta VP, Kapila RK, Sood VK and Rana ND. 1993. Predicting transgression on the basis of combining ability and heterosis in soybean. Journal of Crop Improvement 20 (2): 143-150.
- Hemalatha K, Lal SS and Lal GM. 2017. Study on genetic variability and correlation in blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6: 674-676.
- Johnson HW, Robinson HF and Comstock RE. 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 47: 314-318.
- Kuralarasan V, Vanniarajan C, Kanchana S, Veni K and Lavanya SA. 2018. Genetic divergence, heritability and genetic advance in mutant lines of urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Legume Research 41: 833-836.
- Kurer S, Gangaprasad S, Uma MS, Shanthakumar G and Salimath PM. 2010. Genetic variability studies in F and 2 F generations of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) 3 Walp.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1: 1344 1346.
- Ozukum C and Sharma MB. 2017. Variability among urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) for yield and yield components. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science 2: 26-28.
- Panda DP, Lenka D, Dash AP, Tripathy SK, Behera C and Baisakh B. 2017.Genetic variability and heritability studies in relation to seed yield and its component traits in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Trends in Biosciences 10: 1412-1414.
- Panse VG and Sukhatme PV. 1985. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR New Delhi. p359.
- Panwar NK, Swarup I, Gour L and Jain M. 2019.Assessment of genetic variation and divergence in black gram’s genotypes on climatic condition of Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 8: 986-991.
- Priya L, Pillai A, Shoba D, Kumari SMP and Aananthi N. 2018.Genetic variability and correlation studies in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 9: 1583-1587.
- Rajasekhar D, Lal SS and Lal GM.2017.Character association and path analysis for seed yield and its components in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Plant Archives 17: 467-471.
- Reddy AK, Priya MS, Reddy DM and Reddy BR. 2018. Genetic variability studies in blackgram International Journal of Chemical Studies 6: 2569-2572.
- Rolaniya DK, Jinjwadiya MK, Meghawal DR and Lal GM.2017.Studies on genetic variability in blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) germplasm. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6: 1506-1508.
- Sathees N, Shoba D, Saravanan S, Kumari SMP and Pillai MA. 2019. Studies on genetic variability, association and path coefficient analysis in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8: 1892-1899.
- Senthamizhselvi S, Muthuswamy A and Shunmugavalli N.2019.Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 10: 1600-1605.
- Singh L, Kumar A, Kaur S and Gill RK. 2020. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance as mean for yield and yield contributing traits in urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 9: 2778-2786.
- Sohel MH, Miah MR, Mohiuddin SJ, Islam AKMS, Rahman MM and Haque MA. 2016. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 7: 621-629.
- Sood VK, Rana ND and Gupta VP. 2000. Combining ability and gene action for seed yield and its components in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 60(2): 247-250.
- Sushmitharaj DV, Shoba D and Pillai MA. 2018. Genetic variability and correlation studies in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) with reference to YMV resistance. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6: 2849-2856.
- Tank HK, Sharma PP, Nagar KK, Bairwa LL and Meghawal DR. 2018. Genetic variability and heritability studies in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). International Journal of Chemical Studies 6: 642-646.